Corporate | Programs | Free Tools | Learn | About | Contact | Subscribe via SEP RSS Feed

Forrester Research:
US online marketing will ramp up to $61 billion by 2012

META Keywords: More Harm than Good?

by Kristina Smith on February 20, 2010   Follow me on Twitter

Kristina Smith

Back in the ‘90s, META tags allowed site owners a way to suggest to the search engines the most important terms they wanted to be found for.


When spammers started abusing them – some would stuff their META tags with hundreds of terms, often unrelated to their content – search engines started looking at other factors to rank websites.

 

Currently, none of the major search engines officially say they support it. 

 

With newer algorithms that penalize duplicate content, continuing to use META keyword tags when the major search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing) are ignoring them might not only be a waste of time, it could be harmful.

 

Having repetitive keywords on pages can result in the same filtering, and thus lower ranking, as duplicate content. The only way around this is to enter unique keywords for each page – extremely time consuming, so common practice now is not to enter them at all.

 

True, not using them will make it harder for your site to rank well on META-based search engines like Clusty and Dogpile, but in most cases those bring in only a small percentage of overall traffic to a website anyway. 

 

Should you bother? That’s entirely up to you, but your decision should be a part of an overall search marketing strategy.

Follow me on Twitter

{ 1 trackback }

META Keywords: More Harm than Good? | The Single Entry Point Blog | Drakz Free Online Service
February 21, 2010 at 10:23 am

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Previous post: Grab The Low-Hanging Fruit In The Travel Industry - ‘Hand-Raisers’

Next post: Optimizing META Descriptions for Search